Government of Gujarat vs RUPESH JAGDISHBHAI VIYAS — 9611/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR020117892025
Filing Number
9611/2025
Filing Date
02-Dec-2025
Registration No
9611/2025
Registration Date
02-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, MORBI
Judge
4-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 05-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
2043
Police Station
MORBI B DIV POLICE STATION- MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RUPESH JAGDISHBHAI VIYAS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary The court acquitted accused Rupesh Jagdishbhai Vyas of charges under BNS Section 281 (rash driving) and MV Act Sections 177 and 184, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant alleged the accused drove a vehicle recklessly on October 12, 2025, the court noted that the panch (witnesses) did not substantiate the factual details of the complaint, and absent independent corroborating witnesses, reasonable doubt favored the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
10-Mar-2026
Further Statement
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
07-Mar-2026
Further Statement
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
31-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
02-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 9611/2025
Summary The court acquitted accused Rupesh Jagdishbhai Vyas of charges under BNS Section 281 (rash driving) and MV Act Sections 177 and 184, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant alleged the accused drove a vehicle recklessly on October 12, 2025, the court noted that the panch (witnesses) did not substantiate the factual details of the complaint, and absent independent corroborating witnesses, reasonable doubt favored the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts