Government of Gujarat vs BALDEVSINH GAMBHIRSINH JADEJA — 9236/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020113282025

Filing Number

9236/2025

Filing Date

17-Nov-2025

Registration No

9236/2025

Registration Date

17-Nov-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

3-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

959

Police Station

MORBI A DIV POLICE STATION- MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALDEVSINH GAMBHIRSINH JADEJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Gujarat High Court reduced the sentence of an accused who had voluntarily confessed to an offense under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court found that the lower court failed to consider relevant extenuating circumstances (the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, and first-time offense) and modified the sentence to three months imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 250, citing the principle established in *State of Gujarat V. Natwar Harchandji Thakor* (2005) that extenuating circumstances must be properly considered in sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9236/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court reduced the sentence of an accused who had voluntarily confessed to an offense under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court found that the lower court failed to consider relevant extenuating circumstances (the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, and first-time offense) and modified the sentence to three months imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 250, citing the principle established in *State of Gujarat V. Natwar Harchandji Thakor* (2005) that extenuating circumstances must be properly considered in sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case