Government of Gujarat vs RAJBHAI URFE JIGLO BHIMJIBHAI ADRESHA — 8821/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020108682025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

8821/2025

Filing Date

11-11-2025

Registration No

8821/2025

Registration Date

11-11-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

1171

Police Station

MORBI A DIV POLICE STATION- MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAJBHAI URFE JIGLO BHIMJIBHAI ADRESHA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDER

28-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

12-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

28-11-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing illicit liquor without a permit, but reduced the sentence considering extenuating circumstances such as the accused's poor economic status, family responsibilities, and it being a first offense. The court imposed a sentence of imprisonment until the disposal of the appeal plus a fine of ₹250, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment, following the principle that special and adequate reasons need not be recorded for imposing lesser sentences when circumstances of justice warrant it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing illicit liquor without a permit, but reduced the sentence considering extenuating circumstances such as the accused's poor economic status, family responsibilities, and it being a first offense. The court imposed a sentence of imprisonment until the disposal of the appeal plus a fine of ₹250, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment, following the principle that special and adequate reasons need not be recorded for imposing lesser sentences when circumstances of justice warrant it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case