Government of Gujarat vs REKHABEN LALITBHAI VAGHORA — 8786/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR020108302025
Filing Number
8786/2025
Filing Date
11-Nov-2025
Registration No
8786/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, MORBI
Judge
3-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 05-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1173
Police Station
MORBI A DIV POLICE STATION- MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.REKHABEN LALITBHAI VAGHORA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Gujarat High Court modified the sentence of an accused convicted under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, reducing the punishment from three months imprisonment and ₹200 fine to a fine of ₹250 only. The court held that since the accused had voluntarily pleaded guilty and presented genuine extenuating circumstances (being from a poor background, sole family earner, and first-time offender with no likelihood of recurrence), the lower court's failure to consider these factors warranted sentence reduction in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
28-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
12-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
28-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 8786/2025
Summary The Gujarat High Court modified the sentence of an accused convicted under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, reducing the punishment from three months imprisonment and ₹200 fine to a fine of ₹250 only. The court held that since the accused had voluntarily pleaded guilty and presented genuine extenuating circumstances (being from a poor background, sole family earner, and first-time offender with no likelihood of recurrence), the lower court's failure to consider these factors warranted sentence reduction in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts