Government of Gujarat vs RAMESHBHAI NARANBHAI BABRIYA — 8187/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR020100832025
Filing Number
8187/2025
Filing Date
09-Oct-2025
Registration No
8187/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, MORBI
Judge
5-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1415
Police Station
MORBI B DIV POLICE STATION- MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMESHBHAI NARANBHAI BABRIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Judegement
Court Decision Summary Case No. C.C. 8187/2025 | Morabit Court, Gujarat The court acquitted defendant Rameshbhai Naranmbhai Babariya of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 281 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177 and 184 (rash/negligent vehicle driving endangering life). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt—witness testimonies were contradictory, the panchnama (official record) lacked credibility as witnesses denied knowledge of its contents, and no independent corroborating evidence was presented to establish the defendant's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
06-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
30-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
10-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 8187/2025
Court Decision Summary Case No. C.C. 8187/2025 | Morabit Court, Gujarat The court acquitted defendant Rameshbhai Naranmbhai Babariya of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 281 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177 and 184 (rash/negligent vehicle driving endangering life). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt—witness testimonies were contradictory, the panchnama (official record) lacked credibility as witnesses denied knowledge of its contents, and no independent corroborating evidence was presented to establish the defendant's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts