KISHAN NITINBHAI BHUVA REPRESENTATIVE OF MOZART VITRIFIED PVT. LTD. C.A. - 9,11,193 vs RAJINDER KUMAR PROP. OF SHARMA SANITARY HOUSE — 5446/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020059722022

Filing Number

5446/2022

Filing Date

25-Jul-2022

Registration No

5446/2022

Registration Date

25-Jul-2022

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

4-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHAN NITINBHAI BHUVA REPRESENTATIVE OF MOZART VITRIFIED PVT. LTD. C.A. - 9,11,193

    Adv. M Y PAREKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJINDER KUMAR PROP. OF SHARMA SANITARY HOUSE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court ordered that the accused's bail case be dismissed and the accused directed to appear before the National Load Court on 14 March 2025. The court found the video evidence presented by the prosecution insufficient to support the bail application and accordingly rejected the accused's request to proceed with the case further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  7. 06-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 13-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 16-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 13-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 02-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 20-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 13-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 30-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 15-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 03-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 15-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 15-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 12-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 25-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 20-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 30-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 20-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 11-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 08-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 06-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 04-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 01-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 28-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 27-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 22-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 18-Nov-2022

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 07-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 26-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 25-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5446/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The court ordered that the accused's bail case be dismissed and the accused directed to appear before the National Load Court on 14 March 2025. The court found the video evidence presented by the prosecution insufficient to support the bail application and accordingly rejected the accused's request to proceed with the case further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case