CFM ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PVT LTD - BHASKAR CHAUDHARY vs MAHESH NATHABHAI PARMAR — 518/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 14th July 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJMR020052752026
Filing Number
518/2026
Filing Date
20-May-2026
Registration No
518/2026
Registration Date
20-May-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, MORBI
Judge
7-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
14-Jul-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CFM ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PVT LTD - BHASKAR CHAUDHARY
Adv. C K GANGANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHESH NATHABHAI PARMAR
-
2.KANTABEN MAHESHBHAI PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Jul-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt Ltd v. Mahesh Nathabhai Parmar The court granted CFM Asset Reconstruction's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to seize a residential property in Morbi after the borrowers defaulted on their loan (NPA since July 2024) and failed to pay despite receiving a Section 13(2) notice in January 2026. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the property and hand it over to the lender, requiring the applicant to deposit Rs. 20,000 as commissioner fees and complete proceedings within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Jul-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jul-2026
Order/Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jun-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 518/2026
Case Summary: CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt Ltd v. Mahesh Nathabhai Parmar The court granted CFM Asset Reconstruction's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to seize a residential property in Morbi after the borrowers defaulted on their loan (NPA since July 2024) and failed to pay despite receiving a Section 13(2) notice in January 2026. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the property and hand it over to the lender, requiring the applicant to deposit Rs. 20,000 as commissioner fees and complete proceedings within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts