M.P. SHAH LABOUR OFFICER vs KISHAN PLUS MINERALS — 3501/2025
Case under The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 27,28,29. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR020042902025
Filing Number
3501/2025
Filing Date
19-May-2025
Registration No
3501/2025
Registration Date
19-May-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, MORBI
Judge
7-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M.P. SHAH LABOUR OFFICER
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KISHAN PLUS MINERALS
-
2.PARSHOTAM RAVJIBHAI BAVARAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Morbi convicted the accused under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 1985 and Gujarat Bonds Regulation Rules 1975, Section 27(4), for violating bond conditions. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of ₹1,000 (one thousand rupees), with an alternative punishment of one month simple imprisonment in case of non-payment, finding that the accused had voluntarily admitted guilt and demonstrated remorse, warranting a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3501/2025
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Morbi convicted the accused under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 1985 and Gujarat Bonds Regulation Rules 1975, Section 27(4), for violating bond conditions. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of ₹1,000 (one thousand rupees), with an alternative punishment of one month simple imprisonment in case of non-payment, finding that the accused had voluntarily admitted guilt and demonstrated remorse, warranting a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts