Government of Gujarat vs NAISHADBHAI VINODBHAI OZA Advocate - R H PARMAR — 3706/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020040592022

Filing Number

3706/2022

Filing Date

10-May-2022

Registration No

3706/2022

Registration Date

10-May-2022

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

3-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

188

Police Station

MORBI TALUKA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184,134

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAISHADBHAI VINODBHAI OZA Advocate - R H PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 194, 184, 134. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was responsible for a motor vehicle accident where the victim suffered injuries. The court noted insufficient evidence linking the accused to the incident and determined that the witnesses' testimonies were contradictory and unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  8. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  9. 18-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  10. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  11. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  12. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  13. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  15. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  16. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  17. 15-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  18. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  19. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  20. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  21. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  22. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  23. 01-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  24. 20-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  25. 15-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  26. 18-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  27. 12-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  28. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  29. 11-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  30. 28-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  31. 23-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  32. 05-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  33. 08-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  34. 04-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  35. 12-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  36. 22-May-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  37. 18-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  38. 03-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  39. 14-Mar-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  40. 13-Feb-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  41. 16-Jan-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  42. 26-Dec-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  43. 05-Dec-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  44. 21-Nov-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  45. 11-Oct-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  46. 07-Sep-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  47. 02-Aug-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  48. 11-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 10-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3706/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 194, 184, 134. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was responsible for a motor vehicle accident where the victim suffered injuries. The court noted insufficient evidence linking the accused to the incident and determined that the witnesses' testimonies were contradictory and unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case