M P JOSHI - GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER vs ASHOKBHAI DALSANIYA — 2280/2025
Case under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 22(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR020029802025
Filing Number
2280/2025
Filing Date
03-Apr-2025
Registration No
2280/2025
Registration Date
03-Apr-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, MORBI
Judge
7-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M P JOSHI - GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHOKBHAI DALSANIYA
-
2.ROLTAS PAPER LLP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Morbi convicted the accused under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (Rules 26(d), 26(r), and 22) for violation of minimum wage provisions. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹4,000 (rupees four thousand), with an alternative simple imprisonment of 7 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-May-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2280/2025
The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Morbi convicted the accused under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (Rules 26(d), 26(r), and 22) for violation of minimum wage provisions. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹4,000 (rupees four thousand), with an alternative simple imprisonment of 7 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts