SHABUDIN MALIK - SWISS CERAMIC WORLD vs MAHESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI RANGPARIYA - NITYARAV CERAMIC LLP — 203/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJMR020024462026

Filing Number

203/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

203/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

4-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHABUDIN MALIK - SWISS CERAMIC WORLD

    Adv. A J KHUMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI RANGPARIYA - NITYARAV CERAMIC LLP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court granted bail to the accused in CRMA No. 203/2026, ordering release on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and a surety bond of Rs. 2,00,000. The court found that the accused was not absconding, had community ties, and posed no flight risk, making bail appropriate. Conditions imposed include surrendering the mobile number affidavit to the court and producing a passport within 7 days or submitting an affidavit explaining its non-availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 203/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to the accused in CRMA No. 203/2026, ordering release on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and a surety bond of Rs. 2,00,000. The court found that the accused was not absconding, had community ties, and posed no flight risk, making bail appropriate. Conditions imposed include surrendering the mobile number affidavit to the court and producing a passport within 7 days or submitting an affidavit explaining its non-availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case