Government of Gujarat vs RAJESHBHAI AMARSHIBHAI PARMAR — 1887/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020022912026

Filing Number

1887/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

1887/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

5-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

22

Police Station

RAJKOT RLY. POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESHBHAI AMARSHIBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused Rajeshbhai Amrsiobhai Parmar under Section 25(2) of the IPC and Section 66(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act for unlawfully possessing and consuming liquor. However, considering the accused's impoverished background, first-time offense, and the general nature of the crime, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until court rising and a fine of ₹200, with an additional 10 days of simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1887/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Rajeshbhai Amrsiobhai Parmar under Section 25(2) of the IPC and Section 66(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act for unlawfully possessing and consuming liquor. However, considering the accused's impoverished background, first-time offense, and the general nature of the crime, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until court rising and a fine of ₹200, with an additional 10 days of simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case