LALIT BHANJIBHAI AERVADIYA PARTNER OF MOX TILES LLP vs MR.BABAN PRADKAR PROPRIETOR OF PARADKAR TILES AND SANITARY — 2063/2020
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR020022682020
Filing Number
2063/2020
Filing Date
16-Mar-2020
Registration No
2063/2020
Registration Date
16-Mar-2020
Court
CIVIL COURT, MORBI
Judge
5-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LALIT BHANJIBHAI AERVADIYA PARTNER OF MOX TILES LLP
Adv. K D GHUNCHALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MR.BABAN PRADKAR PROPRIETOR OF PARADKAR TILES AND SANITARY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the accused Mr. Baban Paradkar of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding that the legal notice demanding payment was invalid because it demanded Rs. 2,76,352/- instead of the exact cheque amount of Rs. 2,73,480/-. The court held that the statutory notice must demand the precise cheque amount, and any discrepancy—even typographical errors—renders the notice fatally defective, making the complaint unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
10-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
17-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
02-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
16-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
22-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
06-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
25-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
30-Jan-2025
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
21-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
20-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
21-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
16-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
17-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
17-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
24-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
29-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
31-May-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
18-Apr-2024
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
05-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
02-Feb-2024
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
11-Jan-2024
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
03-Jan-2024
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
30-Nov-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
27-Oct-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
26-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
09-Aug-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
28-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
19-Apr-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
10-Mar-2023
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
11-Jan-2023
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
11-Nov-2022
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
16-Sep-2022
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
17-Aug-2022
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
08-Jul-2022
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
06-May-2022
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2022
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
07-Jan-2022
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
17-Nov-2021
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
25-Aug-2021
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
16-Jun-2021
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
17-Feb-2021
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
02-Dec-2020
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
16-Sep-2020
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
22-Jul-2020
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
20-May-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 2063/2020
Summary The court acquitted the accused Mr. Baban Paradkar of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding that the legal notice demanding payment was invalid because it demanded Rs. 2,76,352/- instead of the exact cheque amount of Rs. 2,73,480/-. The court held that the statutory notice must demand the precise cheque amount, and any discrepancy—even typographical errors—renders the notice fatally defective, making the complaint unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts