Government of Gujarat vs BHARTIBEN MAHESHBHAI KAGATHARA Advocate - M K JADEJA — 2019/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 325,323,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020021412021

Filing Number

2019/2021

Filing Date

18-Feb-2021

Registration No

2019/2021

Registration Date

18-Feb-2021

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

7-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

372

Police Station

MORBI TALUKA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 325,323,114
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARTIBEN MAHESHBHAI KAGATHARA Advocate - M K JADEJA

  2. 2.PRAVINBHAI VITHALBHAI KAGATHARA

    Adv. M K JADEJA

  3. 3.ASHWINBHAI NAVGHANBHAI KAGATHARA

    Adv. M K JADEJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Morbi acquitted three defendants (Bhartiben Maheshbhai Kagthara, Pravinbhai Vitthalbhai Kagthara, and Ashwinbhai Navghanbhai Kagthara) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 325, 504, 114 and GP Act Section 135, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined the complainant's witnesses provided hearsay evidence lacking direct observation of the alleged incident, and key details contradicted between accounts, warranting benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 22-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 27-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 08-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 17-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 08-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 24-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 05-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 16-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  28. 26-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  29. 02-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  30. 12-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  31. 06-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  32. 21-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  33. 04-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  34. 26-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  35. 01-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  36. 31-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  37. 02-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  38. 19-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  39. 27-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  40. 29-Aug-2022

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  41. 25-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  42. 23-May-2022

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  43. 04-Apr-2022

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  44. 21-Feb-2022

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  45. 04-Feb-2022

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  46. 23-Nov-2021

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  47. 26-Oct-2021

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  48. 14-Sep-2021

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  49. 17-Aug-2021

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  50. 19-Jul-2021

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  51. 17-May-2021

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  52. 08-Apr-2021

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  53. 18-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 18-Feb-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2019/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Morbi acquitted three defendants (Bhartiben Maheshbhai Kagthara, Pravinbhai Vitthalbhai Kagthara, and Ashwinbhai Navghanbhai Kagthara) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 325, 504, 114 and GP Act Section 135, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined the complainant's witnesses provided hearsay evidence lacking direct observation of the alleged incident, and key details contradicted between accounts, warranting benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case