TYGER HOME FINANCE PVT LTD - KISHORBHAI KAVAD vs PRAKASHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI PATEL — 150/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJMR020014772026

Filing Number

150/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

150/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

7-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TYGER HOME FINANCE PVT LTD - KISHORBHAI KAVAD

    Adv. V J LAKKAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI PATEL

  2. 2.GAYATRIBEN PRAKASHBHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Morbi allowed Tyger Home Finance Pvt. Ltd.'s application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to seize a mortgaged commercial property from borrowers who defaulted on their loan (NPA since July 2025) despite receiving notice under Section 13(2). The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take peaceful possession of the office property at Nandan Plaza, Morbi, and hand it over to the finance company, with police assistance and completion within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 150/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Morbi allowed Tyger Home Finance Pvt. Ltd.'s application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to seize a mortgaged commercial property from borrowers who defaulted on their loan (NPA since July 2025) despite receiving notice under Section 13(2). The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take peaceful possession of the office property at Nandan Plaza, Morbi, and hand it over to the finance company, with police assistance and completion within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case