Government of Gujarat vs MAHEBUBBHAI SULEMANBHAI SUMARA — 538/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR020006572026
Filing Number
538/2026
Filing Date
23-Jan-2026
Registration No
538/2026
Registration Date
23-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, MORBI
Judge
3-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 05-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
2395
Police Station
MORBI TALUKA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHEBUBBHAI SULEMANBHAI SUMARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Summary The Gujarat High Court reduced the sentence of the accused convicted under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding that the trial court failed to consider mitigating circumstances including the accused's impoverished background, first-time offence, and commitment to reform. The court modified the sentence to three months imprisonment (from the original minimum term) plus a fine of ₹250, holding that courts must consider extenuating factors in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 538/2026
Summary The Gujarat High Court reduced the sentence of the accused convicted under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding that the trial court failed to consider mitigating circumstances including the accused's impoverished background, first-time offence, and commitment to reform. The court modified the sentence to three months imprisonment (from the original minimum term) plus a fine of ₹250, holding that courts must consider extenuating factors in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts