Government of Gujarat vs KETANBHAI VINODBHAI DILUBHA MASANI — 485/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020005982026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

485/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

485/2026

Registration Date

22-01-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

2642

Police Station

MORBI TALUKA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KETANBHAI VINODBHAI DILUBHA MASANI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDER

28-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary The Gujarat High Court modified the sentence of the accused (convicted under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65AA) from imprisonment to a fine of Rs. 200 with 7 days imprisonment in default, considering mitigating circumstances such as the accused being a first-time offender from a poor background with family responsibilities. The court held that special and adequate reasons are not required to impose minimum imprisonment, and sentence reduction is justified in the interest of justice based on extenuating circumstances not previously considered by the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Gujarat High Court modified the sentence of the accused (convicted under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65AA) from imprisonment to a fine of Rs. 200 with 7 days imprisonment in default, considering mitigating circumstances such as the accused being a first-time offender from a poor background with family responsibilities. The court held that special and adequate reasons are not required to impose minimum imprisonment, and sentence reduction is justified in the interest of justice based on extenuating circumstances not previously considered by the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case