Government of Gujarat vs MANAVBHAI ASHOKBHAI RAMANANDI — 448/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020005532026

Filing Number

448/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

448/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

3-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1776

Police Station

MORBI TALUKA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANAVBHAI ASHOKBHAI RAMANANDI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 65AA of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act for possessing illegal narcotics without a permit. The court reduced the sentence from the trial court's order to 7 days imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200, considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances, first-time offense, and genuine remorse, citing established precedent that extenuating circumstances warrant modification of sentences in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge And A.C.J.M.

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 448/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 65AA of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act for possessing illegal narcotics without a permit. The court reduced the sentence from the trial court's order to 7 days imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200, considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances, first-time offense, and genuine remorse, citing established precedent that extenuating circumstances warrant modification of sentences in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case