Government of Gujarat vs LABHUBHAI RAJUBHAI KURIYA — 447/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020005522026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

447/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

447/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

1794

Police Station

MORBI TALUKA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

LABHUBHAI RAJUBHAI KURIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDER

28-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused Labhubai Rajubai Kuriya under Section 54(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act for illegally possessing and consuming liquor, and sentenced her to imprisonment up to court's discretion plus a fine of Rs. 200, with 10 days additional imprisonment if fine is not paid. Considering the accused's poor economic status, first-time offense, and voluntary confession, the court exercised judicial discretion to impose a lenient sentence rather than the statutory minimum, following precedent that courts can award lighter punishment in common offenses when justified by special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Labhubai Rajubai Kuriya under Section 54(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act for illegally possessing and consuming liquor, and sentenced her to imprisonment up to court's discretion plus a fine of Rs. 200, with 10 days additional imprisonment if fine is not paid. Considering the accused's poor economic status, first-time offense, and voluntary confession, the court exercised judicial discretion to impose a lenient sentence rather than the statutory minimum, following precedent that courts can award lighter punishment in common offenses when justified by special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case