Government of Gujarat vs LABHUBHAI RAJUBHAI KURIYA — 447/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR020005522026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
447/2026
Filing Date
21-01-2026
Registration No
447/2026
Registration Date
21-01-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, MORBI
Judge
3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
1794
Police Station
MORBI TALUKA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LABHUBHAI RAJUBHAI KURIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 28-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused Labhubai Rajubai Kuriya under Section 54(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act for illegally possessing and consuming liquor, and sentenced her to imprisonment up to court's discretion plus a fine of Rs. 200, with 10 days additional imprisonment if fine is not paid. Considering the accused's poor economic status, first-time offense, and voluntary confession, the court exercised judicial discretion to impose a lenient sentence rather than the statutory minimum, following precedent that courts can award lighter punishment in common offenses when justified by special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused Labhubai Rajubai Kuriya under Section 54(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act for illegally possessing and consuming liquor, and sentenced her to imprisonment up to court's discretion plus a fine of Rs. 200, with 10 days additional imprisonment if fine is not paid. Considering the accused's poor economic status, first-time offense, and voluntary confession, the court exercised judicial discretion to impose a lenient sentence rather than the statutory minimum, following precedent that courts can award lighter punishment in common offenses when justified by special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts