Government of Gujarat vs SIKANDARBHAI URFE SIKALO KASAMBHAI SANDHAVANI — 443/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020005482026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

443/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

443/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

1822

Police Station

MORBI TALUKA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SIKANDARBHAI URFE SIKALO KASAMBHAI SANDHAVANI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDER

28-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing alcohol without a permit and upheld the conviction. However, the court reduced the sentence from three months imprisonment to a fine of Rs. 250, considering the accused's extenuating circumstances (first-time offender, from poor background, family dependent on him) and holding that the lower court had failed to consider these relevant factors while imposing the original sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing alcohol without a permit and upheld the conviction. However, the court reduced the sentence from three months imprisonment to a fine of Rs. 250, considering the accused's extenuating circumstances (first-time offender, from poor background, family dependent on him) and holding that the lower court had failed to consider these relevant factors while imposing the original sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case