Government of Gujarat vs SUNILBHAI AVACHARBHAI BARAIYA — 442/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020005472026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

442/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

442/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

1825

Police Station

MORBI TALUKA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SUNILBHAI AVACHARBHAI BARAIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDER

28-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Gujarat High Court modified the sentence imposed on the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65AA, reducing it in the interest of justice. The court held that the trial judge failed to consider relevant extenuating circumstances (the accused's first offense, poor economic background, and commitment not to reoffend), and relying on precedent, modified the sentence to a fine of ₹250 instead of imprisonment, while maintaining the vehicle forfeiture order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court modified the sentence imposed on the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65AA, reducing it in the interest of justice. The court held that the trial judge failed to consider relevant extenuating circumstances (the accused's first offense, poor economic background, and commitment not to reoffend), and relying on precedent, modified the sentence to a fine of ₹250 instead of imprisonment, while maintaining the vehicle forfeiture order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case