Government of Gujarat vs CHANDRASHEKHAR CHALITAR SADAY — 441/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMR020005462026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
441/2026
Filing Date
21-01-2026
Registration No
441/2026
Registration Date
21-01-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, MORBI
Judge
3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
1854
Police Station
MORBI TALUKA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
CHANDRASHEKHAR CHALITAR SADAY
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 28-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Gujarat High Court modified the sentence of an accused convicted under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, reducing the imprisonment term while maintaining a fine of Rs. 250, considering extenuating circumstances such as the accused's first-time offense, poor economic background, and family responsibilities that the trial court had failed to consider. The court held that courts can impose lenient sentences based on genuine mitigating factors, and that setting a precedent for sentence reduction is not a valid reason to ignore an accused's legitimate circumstances when dispensing justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gujarat High Court modified the sentence of an accused convicted under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, reducing the imprisonment term while maintaining a fine of Rs. 250, considering extenuating circumstances such as the accused's first-time offense, poor economic background, and family responsibilities that the trial court had failed to consider. The court held that courts can impose lenient sentences based on genuine mitigating factors, and that setting a precedent for sentence reduction is not a valid reason to ignore an accused's legitimate circumstances when dispensing justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts