Government of Gujarat vs RAFIKBHAI NURMAMADBHAI JAM — 194/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020002232026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

194/2026

Filing Date

07-01-2026

Registration No

194/2026

Registration Date

07-01-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

2237

Police Station

MORBI B DIV POLICE STATION- MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 184,177,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAFIKBHAI NURMAMADBHAI JAM

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

16-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

07-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

28-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

21-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Rafikbhai Nurmohmadbhai Jaam, of charges under BNS Section 281 (rash driving) and MV Act Sections 177 and 184, finding insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he drove recklessly and endangered public life. The court noted that the panchnama (official record) witnesses failed to substantiate key facts of the case, and critical independent witnesses were not examined, creating reasonable doubt in the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Rafikbhai Nurmohmadbhai Jaam, of charges under BNS Section 281 (rash driving) and MV Act Sections 177 and 184, finding insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he drove recklessly and endangered public life. The court noted that the panchnama (official record) witnesses failed to substantiate key facts of the case, and critical independent witnesses were not examined, creating reasonable doubt in the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case