Government of Gujarat vs ANILKUMAR RAMKUMAR MAHATO — 183/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMR020002102026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

183/2026

Filing Date

07-01-2026

Registration No

183/2026

Registration Date

07-01-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI

Judge

4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

2255

Police Station

MORBI B DIV POLICE STATION- MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 184,177,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

ANILKUMAR RAMKUMAR MAHATO

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M.

16-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

07-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

28-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

21-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted accused Anilkumar Ramkumar Mahto of charges under BNS Section 281 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177 and 184 for rash/negligent driving, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the vehicle rashly or negligently, as the independent witness (panchayat members) did not corroborate the FIR allegations, and no independent corroborating witnesses were recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted accused Anilkumar Ramkumar Mahto of charges under BNS Section 281 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177 and 184 for rash/negligent driving, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the vehicle rashly or negligently, as the independent witness (panchayat members) did not corroborate the FIR allegations, and no independent corroborating witnesses were recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, MORBI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case