BALUBHAI AMARSHIBHAI KADHIVAR vs MANSUKHBHAI VELJIBHAI CHAVDA URFE MUNNABHAI Advocate - C D KARIA — 1542/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 448. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI- SESSIONS
CNR: GJMR010036042025
Filing Number
1542/2025
Filing Date
26-Dec-2025
Registration No
1542/2025
Registration Date
26-Dec-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT,MORBI
Judge
2-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALUBHAI AMARSHIBHAI KADHIVAR
Adv. J C SEVARA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANSUKHBHAI VELJIBHAI CHAVDA URFE MUNNABHAI Advocate - C D KARIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary The Sessions Judge, Morbi rejected the applicant's request to transfer a cheque bounce case (Section 138 NI Act) back to the original court where the trial began. The court held that since only the complainant's evidence is complete and the accused's statement, defence evidence, and final arguments remain pending, the transfer request lacked sufficient grounds and was contrary to proper judicial administration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Reply
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Reply
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Reply
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1542/2025
Summary The Sessions Judge, Morbi rejected the applicant's request to transfer a cheque bounce case (Section 138 NI Act) back to the original court where the trial began. The court held that since only the complainant's evidence is complete and the accused's statement, defence evidence, and final arguments remain pending, the transfer request lacked sufficient grounds and was contrary to proper judicial administration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts