SATKA MEGHAJI VIRAMBHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 763/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th May 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI- SESSIONS
CNR: GJMR010015562026
Filing Number
763/2026
Filing Date
20-May-2026
Registration No
763/2026
Registration Date
20-May-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT,MORBI
Judge
1-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
30-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
613
Police Station
MORBI A DIV POLICE STATION- MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATKA MEGHAJI VIRAMBHAI
Adv. H L CHAVDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CRMA(S) 763/2026 The Court of the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Morbi rejected the anticipatory bail application of Satka Meghaji Virambhai under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant was seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with serious Prohibition Act violations involving illicit transportation and delivery of Indian Made Foreign Liquor valued at Rs. 50,38,800/-, where he allegedly played an active supervisory role. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement, noted his prior criminal history and habitual pattern in similar offences, and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary for investigation while rejecting arguments about family hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
29-May-2026
Order
2nd Addl District Judge
-
27-May-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 763/2026
Case Summary: CRMA(S) 763/2026 The Court of the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Morbi rejected the anticipatory bail application of Satka Meghaji Virambhai under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant was seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with serious Prohibition Act violations involving illicit transportation and delivery of Indian Made Foreign Liquor valued at Rs. 50,38,800/-, where he allegedly played an active supervisory role. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement, noted his prior criminal history and habitual pattern in similar offences, and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary for investigation while rejecting arguments about family hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts