SOYAB UMARBHAI JAM vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 278/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI- SESSIONS

CNR: GJMR010005472026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

278/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

278/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT,MORBI

Judge

3-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

4

Police Station

WANKANER CITY POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

SOYAB UMARBHAI JAM

Adv. R K KOBIYA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Morbi, rejected the bail application of Soyab Umarbhai Jam, who was accused of illegal possession and transportation of 4,944 bottles of prohibited liquor worth Rs. 8,10,480 under the Prohibition Act. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of the applicant's active involvement in the offense and held that the seriousness of the violation of prohibition laws and the large quantity of contraband recovered outweighed mitigating factors like his clean record and family dependence, ruling that mere filing of the chargesheet alone cannot warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Morbi, rejected the bail application of Soyab Umarbhai Jam, who was accused of illegal possession and transportation of 4,944 bottles of prohibited liquor worth Rs. 8,10,480 under the Prohibition Act. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of the applicant's active involvement in the offense and held that the seriousness of the violation of prohibition laws and the large quantity of contraband recovered outweighed mitigating factors like his clean record and family dependence, ruling that mere filing of the chargesheet alone cannot warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT,MORBI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case