SOYAB UMARBHAI JAM vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 278/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI- SESSIONS
CNR: GJMR010005472026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
278/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
278/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT,MORBI
Judge
3-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
WANKANER CITY POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SOYAB UMARBHAI JAM
Adv. R K KOBIYA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Morbi, rejected the bail application of Soyab Umarbhai Jam, who was accused of illegal possession and transportation of 4,944 bottles of prohibited liquor worth Rs. 8,10,480 under the Prohibition Act. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of the applicant's active involvement in the offense and held that the seriousness of the violation of prohibition laws and the large quantity of contraband recovered outweighed mitigating factors like his clean record and family dependence, ruling that mere filing of the chargesheet alone cannot warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Morbi, rejected the bail application of Soyab Umarbhai Jam, who was accused of illegal possession and transportation of 4,944 bottles of prohibited liquor worth Rs. 8,10,480 under the Prohibition Act. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of the applicant's active involvement in the offense and held that the seriousness of the violation of prohibition laws and the large quantity of contraband recovered outweighed mitigating factors like his clean record and family dependence, ruling that mere filing of the chargesheet alone cannot warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts