HIMALAY DILIPBHAI SUVARIYA vs RUTURAJSINH PRADHUMANSINH ZALA Advocate - B S JETHA — 42/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMR010005442026

Filing Number

42/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT,MORBI

Judge

2-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HIMALAY DILIPBHAI SUVARIYA

    Adv. J D SOLANKI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RUTURAJSINH PRADHUMANSINH ZALA Advocate - B S JETHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Morbi allowed a compromise between the appellant (convicted of cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) and the respondent, holding that the offense is compoundable under Section 147 of the NI Act. The court set aside the conviction order and acquitted the appellant, relying on Supreme Court precedent permitting compromise even at appellate stage, without imposing compounding charges to uphold the Lok Adalat's dispute resolution purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Morbi allowed a compromise between the appellant (convicted of cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) and the respondent, holding that the offense is compoundable under Section 147 of the NI Act. The court set aside the conviction order and acquitted the appellant, relying on Supreme Court precedent permitting compromise even at appellate stage, without imposing compounding charges to uphold the Lok Adalat's dispute resolution purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case