KISHAN MOHANLAL GURJAR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 270/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI- SESSIONS

CNR: GJMR010005352026

Filing Number

270/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

270/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT,MORBI

Judge

1-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

159

Police Station

TANKARA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHAN MOHANLAL GURJAR

    Adv. T M BALDHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Morbi allowed the bail application of Kishan Mohanlal Gurjar, who was arrested in connection with theft of government property (muddamal) and related offences under sections 303(2), 324(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 136 of the Indian Electricity Act. The court granted regular bail with a bond of ₹50,000, applying the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is an exception," considering the absence of capital punishment, lack of criminal antecedents, and pendency of investigation regarding the applicant's actual role. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 270/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Morbi allowed the bail application of Kishan Mohanlal Gurjar, who was arrested in connection with theft of government property (muddamal) and related offences under sections 303(2), 324(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 136 of the Indian Electricity Act. The court granted regular bail with a bond of ₹50,000, applying the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is an exception," considering the absence of capital punishment, lack of criminal antecedents, and pendency of investigation regarding the applicant's actual role. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case