CHHAGANBHAI NAGJIBHAI DHARIYAR PARMAR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP — 266/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI- SESSIONS

CNR: GJMR010005312026

Filing Number

266/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

266/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT,MORBI

Judge

2-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1033

Police Station

HALVAD POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

1.CHHAGANBHAI NAGJIBHAI DHARIYAR PARMAR

Adv. M D GANESHIYA

Respondent(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
13-Mar-2026

Judegement

Court Decision Summary The Morbi Sessions Court rejected the bail application of accused Chhaganabhai Nagjibhai Dhariya Parmar in a criminal conspiracy case involving forged government documents and land fraud. The court found that the accused actively participated with the main conspirator to create fake revenue records, forge official stamps and signatures, and fraudulently register government land in their names, obtaining a ₹10 crore bank loan through this scheme—constituting grave offences under IPC Sections 409, 467-468, 471-472, 120(B), and 34 with potential life imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
13-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District And Sessions Judge
10-Mar-2026

Order

Principal District And Sessions Judge
09-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
05-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 266/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Morbi Sessions Court rejected the bail application of accused Chhaganabhai Nagjibhai Dhariya Parmar in a criminal conspiracy case involving forged government documents and land fraud. The court found that the accused actively participated with the main conspirator to create fake revenue records, forge official stamps and signatures, and fraudulently register government land in their names, obtaining a ₹10 crore bank loan through this scheme—constituting grave offences under IPC Sections 409, 467-468, 471-472, 120(B), and 34 with potential life imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.