BAVJIBHAI URFE BALABHAI BECHARBHAI UKEDIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 265/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI- SESSIONS

CNR: GJMR010005302026

Filing Number

265/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

265/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT,MORBI

Judge

3-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

1.BAVJIBHAI URFE BALABHAI BECHARBHAI UKEDIYA

Adv. K M GARCHAR
2.MERUBHAI BAVJIBHAI UKEDIYA
3.RASIKBHAI DEVSHIBHAI THARESA

Respondent(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
11-Mar-2026

JudegementView PDF

The Court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by three farming applicants facing charges under Sections 316(2), 337, 338, 340(2), and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The Court found that the investigation was at a preliminary stage, the applicants presented incomplete and selective documentary evidence to the Court, and such conduct demonstrated they did not approach with clean hands, amounting to misuse of judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Mar-2026

Disposed

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
10-Mar-2026

Order

Addl.district & Sessions Judge
07-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
05-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 265/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by three farming applicants facing charges under Sections 316(2), 337, 338, 340(2), and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. The Court found that the investigation was at a preliminary stage, the applicants presented incomplete and selective documentary evidence to the Court, and such conduct demonstrated they did not approach with clean hands, amounting to misuse of judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.