VIKRAMSING NARAYANSING CHAUHAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 259/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI- SESSIONS
CNR: GJMR010005192026
Filing Number
259/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
259/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT,MORBI
Judge
3-Addl.district & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
120
Police Station
MALIYA MIYANA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIKRAMSING NARAYANSING CHAUHAN
Adv. J M PARIKH
-
2.KAMAL KISHOR PREMARAM MARU NAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge of Morbi rejected the regular bail application filed by Vikramsingh Chauhan and Kamal Kishore Maru Nai, who were arrested for transporting 19,068 bottles of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 1.38 crore under Gujarat's Prohibition Act. The court found credible evidence of their involvement in the offense and determined there was reasonable apprehension they would flee trial, given they were permanent residents of Rajasthan, making bail unsuitable in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 259/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge of Morbi rejected the regular bail application filed by Vikramsingh Chauhan and Kamal Kishore Maru Nai, who were arrested for transporting 19,068 bottles of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 1.38 crore under Gujarat's Prohibition Act. The court found credible evidence of their involvement in the offense and determined there was reasonable apprehension they would flee trial, given they were permanent residents of Rajasthan, making bail unsuitable in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts