VIKRAMSING NARAYANSING CHAUHAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 259/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI- SESSIONS

CNR: GJMR010005192026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

259/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

259/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT,MORBI

Judge

3-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

120

Police Station

MALIYA MIYANA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

VIKRAMSING NARAYANSING CHAUHAN

Adv. J M PARIKH

KAMAL KISHOR PREMARAM MARU NAI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

ORDER

07-03-2026

HEARING

06-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The Additional Sessions Judge of Morbi rejected the regular bail application filed by Vikramsingh Chauhan and Kamal Kishore Maru Nai, who were arrested for transporting 19,068 bottles of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 1.38 crore under Gujarat's Prohibition Act. The court found credible evidence of their involvement in the offense and determined there was reasonable apprehension they would flee trial, given they were permanent residents of Rajasthan, making bail unsuitable in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge of Morbi rejected the regular bail application filed by Vikramsingh Chauhan and Kamal Kishore Maru Nai, who were arrested for transporting 19,068 bottles of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 1.38 crore under Gujarat's Prohibition Act. The court found credible evidence of their involvement in the offense and determined there was reasonable apprehension they would flee trial, given they were permanent residents of Rajasthan, making bail unsuitable in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT,MORBI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case