NARENDRBHAI JAGDISHBHAI MER vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 248/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI- SESSIONS
CNR: GJMR010004952026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
248/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
248/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT,MORBI
Judge
1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1085
Police Station
MORBI A DIV POLICE STATION- MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NARENDRBHAI JAGDISHBHAI MER
Adv. F J OZA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Morbi conditionally allowed the applicant's petition to obtain interim custody of his seized Vivo X70 Pro mobile phone (IMEI: 868265058464959). The court found the applicant's ownership established through a purchase bill, and determined that the investigation did not require further custody of the device. The phone was released on the applicant furnishing a personal bond of 1.5 times the device's assessed value with a surety, subject to conditions prohibiting its use in crimes, sale, or transfer without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Morbi conditionally allowed the applicant's petition to obtain interim custody of his seized Vivo X70 Pro mobile phone (IMEI: 868265058464959). The court found the applicant's ownership established through a purchase bill, and determined that the investigation did not require further custody of the device. The phone was released on the applicant furnishing a personal bond of 1.5 times the device's assessed value with a surety, subject to conditions prohibiting its use in crimes, sale, or transfer without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts