PRAVINBHAI SHIVRAMBHAI MOD - ANJALI ENTERPRISE vs NILESHBHAI ARJANBHAI AMRUTIYA - VAIBHAV POLYWAVE LLP Advocate - H L CHAVDA — 18/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415,423,427,430,432,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJMR010001932026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
18/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
18/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT,MORBI
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAVINBHAI SHIVRAMBHAI MOD - ANJALI ENTERPRISE
Adv. V J LAKKAD
Respondent(s)
NILESHBHAI ARJANBHAI AMRUTIYA - VAIBHAV POLYWAVE LLP Advocate - H L CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT | |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge Morbi set aside the conviction of Pravinbhai Shivrambhai Mod under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and acquitted him, after both parties reached an out-of-court settlement. The court accepted the compromise under Section 147 of the NI Act (compoundable offense) and Section 320(2)(8) of CrPC, citing the Supreme Court precedent that appellate courts can permit compounding even at the appeal stage, particularly considering the accused's poor financial condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge Morbi set aside the conviction of Pravinbhai Shivrambhai Mod under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and acquitted him, after both parties reached an out-of-court settlement. The court accepted the compromise under Section 147 of the NI Act (compoundable offense) and Section 320(2)(8) of CrPC, citing the Supreme Court precedent that appellate courts can permit compounding even at the appeal stage, particularly considering the accused's poor financial condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts