THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NIJAMBHAI IBRAHIMBHAI AAMRONIYA Advocate - F J OZA — 70/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(B). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI- SESSIONS

CNR: GJMR010001052026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

70/2026

Filing Date

19-01-2026

Registration No

70/2026

Registration Date

19-01-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT,MORBI

Judge

3-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

685

Police Station

TANKARA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483(B)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. AGP

Respondent(s)

NIJAMBHAI IBRAHIMBHAI AAMRONIYA Advocate - F J OZA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

ORDER

11-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

REPLY

21-02-2026

REPLY

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Court rejected the State's application to cancel the bail of accused Nizambhai under Section 483(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Although the accused failed to mark attendance at the police station as required by bail condition no.2, the Court accepted his explanation that on 27-01-2026 his car was punctured while traveling, causing unavoidable delay, and found no willful breach or illegal conduct thereafter. The Court concluded the grounds for bail cancellation had become infructuous and rejected the application in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Court rejected the State's application to cancel the bail of accused Nizambhai under Section 483(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Although the accused failed to mark attendance at the police station as required by bail condition no.2, the Court accepted his explanation that on 27-01-2026 his car was punctured while traveling, causing unavoidable delay, and found no willful breach or illegal conduct thereafter. The Court concluded the grounds for bail cancellation had become infructuous and rejected the application in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT,MORBI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case