THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NIJAMBHAI IBRAHIMBHAI AAMRONIYA Advocate - F J OZA — 70/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(B). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLI- SESSIONS
CNR: GJMR010001052026
Filing Number
70/2026
Filing Date
19-Jan-2026
Registration No
70/2026
Registration Date
19-Jan-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT,MORBI
Judge
3-Addl.district & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 05-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
685
Police Station
TANKARA POLICE STATION - MORBI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
-
1.NIJAMBHAI IBRAHIMBHAI AAMRONIYA Advocate - F J OZA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Court rejected the State's application to cancel the bail of accused Nizambhai under Section 483(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Although the accused failed to mark attendance at the police station as required by bail condition no.2, the Court accepted his explanation that on 27-01-2026 his car was punctured while traveling, causing unavoidable delay, and found no willful breach or illegal conduct thereafter. The Court concluded the grounds for bail cancellation had become infructuous and rejected the application in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Reply
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Reply
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Reply
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 70/2026
Summary The Court rejected the State's application to cancel the bail of accused Nizambhai under Section 483(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Although the accused failed to mark attendance at the police station as required by bail condition no.2, the Court accepted his explanation that on 27-01-2026 his car was punctured while traveling, causing unavoidable delay, and found no willful breach or illegal conduct thereafter. The Court concluded the grounds for bail cancellation had become infructuous and rejected the application in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts