The State of Gujarat vs PRINCE DINESHBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL Advocate - S M BABUDI — 210/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH160003152025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
210/2025
Filing Date
23-09-2025
Registration No
210/2025
Registration Date
23-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT-JOTANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206020250691
Police Station
KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRINCE DINESHBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL Advocate - S M BABUDI
RAMESHJI SOMAJI DAHYAJI THAKOR
Adv. C K RAVAL
AMARKUMAR DEVABHAI KHODIDAS PATEL
Adv. R H THAKOR
VIKRAMJI KANUJI MADHAJI VIHOL
Adv. C K RAVAL
PRAKASHJI KANAJI KHODAJI THAKOR
Adv. C K RAVAL
KHODAJI AMBUJI BHARUJI DABHI
Adv. C K RAVAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 16-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Jotana Sessions Court convicted six accused persons under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of foodstuff) and Section 12 of the Gambling Act. The court sentenced each accused to imprisonment with a fine of ₹1,200, with an additional four days of imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court found that the accused had voluntarily confessed to their offenses, and there was no reason to doubt the credibility of their admissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Jotana Sessions Court convicted six accused persons under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of foodstuff) and Section 12 of the Gambling Act. The court sentenced each accused to imprisonment with a fine of ₹1,200, with an additional four days of imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court found that the accused had voluntarily confessed to their offenses, and there was no reason to doubt the credibility of their admissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts