The State of Gujarat vs THAKOR VISHNUJI BHAIJIJI Advocate - B M CHAVADA — 113/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH160001722025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
113/2025
Filing Date
17-06-2025
Registration No
113/2025
Registration Date
17-06-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT-JOTANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206038240394
Police Station
LANGHNAJ POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
THAKOR VISHNUJI BHAIJIJI Advocate - B M CHAVADA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the defendant Thakore Vishnuji Bhaijiji of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, and Gambling Prevention Act Section 135. The court found that while the complainant alleged the defendant assaulted him with a stick during a cattle-grazing dispute on 17/06/2024, the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses contradicted the allegations during cross-examination and confirmed no actual injury occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the defendant Thakore Vishnuji Bhaijiji of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, and Gambling Prevention Act Section 135. The court found that while the complainant alleged the defendant assaulted him with a stick during a cattle-grazing dispute on 17/06/2024, the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses contradicted the allegations during cross-examination and confirmed no actual injury occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts