TANK MAHMADMIYA JAHANGIRMIYA vs MAKSUDBHAI BHIKHABHAI BELIM Advocate - M H GANDHI — 12/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 30-Mar-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJMH160001132025

Filing Number

12/2025

Filing Date

03-Apr-2025

Registration No

12/2025

Registration Date

04-Apr-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT-JOTANA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TANK MAHMADMIYA JAHANGIRMIYA

    Adv. A V VYAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAKSUDBHAI BHIKHABHAI BELIM Advocate - M H GANDHI

  2. 2.IQBALBHAI BHIKHABHAI BELIM

    Adv. M H GANDHI

  3. 3.ABDULBHAI BHIKHABHAI BELIM

    Adv. M H GANDHI

  4. 4.O N G C ( L A Q VIBHAG)

Case History

  1. 30-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The court rejected the defendants' application for interim injunction under Order 39 CPC. While the court found that defendants (as legal heirs of the deceased property owner) established a prima facie case regarding their entitlement to ONGC rent payments, it held that they failed to prove the balance of convenience favored them or that they would suffer irreparable loss. Since ONGC had already stopped paying rent to anyone pending resolution, the monetary damages could be compensated at final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 18-Oct-2025

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 04-Oct-2025

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 04-Sep-2025

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 02-Aug-2025

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 02-Jul-2025

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 17-Jun-2025

    Reply To Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 02-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 03-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court rejected the defendants' application for interim injunction under Order 39 CPC. While the court found that defendants (as legal heirs of the deceased property owner) established a prima facie case regarding their entitlement to ONGC rent payments, it held that they failed to prove the balance of convenience favored them or that they would suffer irreparable loss. Since ONGC had already stopped paying rent to anyone pending resolution, the monetary damages could be compensated at final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case