GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SAIYAD FAKIR MAHMAD NURUDDINMIYA Advocate - M M GHANCHI — 9/2024
Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Section 11(1)a. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH160000172024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9/2024
Filing Date
16-06-2005
Registration No
9/2024
Registration Date
16-06-2005
Court
TALUKA COURT-JOTANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
II 105
Police Station
KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. B B CHAVDA
Respondent(s)
SAIYAD FAKIR MAHMAD NURUDDINMIYA Advocate - M M GHANCHI
SHEKH MUSTUFA KASAMBHAI
SHEKH MAHMAD SAHIDBHAI ABDUL RAHEMANBHAI
KURESHI MAHMAD EKABALBHAI HASAMBHAI
SHEKH JAVID MAHMADSAFIBHAI
SHEKH MAKBUL AHEMADBHAI ABDULBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 21-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 07-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jotana discharged all six accused persons and disposed of the animal cruelty case (FIR II/105/2005) due to the prosecution's persistent inability to serve summons on the accused or secure witness attendance over nearly two decades. The court found it futile to continue proceedings without the necessary stakeholders and prioritized timely judicial resolution over indefinite pending litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jotana discharged all six accused persons and disposed of the animal cruelty case (FIR II/105/2005) due to the prosecution's persistent inability to serve summons on the accused or secure witness attendance over nearly two decades. The court found it futile to continue proceedings without the necessary stakeholders and prioritized timely judicial resolution over indefinite pending litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts