GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SAIYAD FAKIR MAHMAD NURUDDINMIYA Advocate - M M GHANCHI — 9/2024
Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Section 11(1)a. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH160000172024
Filing Number
9/2024
Filing Date
16-Jun-2005
Registration No
9/2024
Registration Date
16-Jun-2005
Court
TALUKA COURT-JOTANA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
II 105
Police Station
KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. B B CHAVDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAIYAD FAKIR MAHMAD NURUDDINMIYA Advocate - M M GHANCHI
-
2.SHEKH MUSTUFA KASAMBHAI
-
3.SHEKH MAHMAD SAHIDBHAI ABDUL RAHEMANBHAI
-
4.KURESHI MAHMAD EKABALBHAI HASAMBHAI
-
5.SHEKH JAVID MAHMADSAFIBHAI
-
6.SHEKH MAKBUL AHEMADBHAI ABDULBHAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jotana discharged all six accused persons and disposed of the animal cruelty case (FIR II/105/2005) due to the prosecution's persistent inability to serve summons on the accused or secure witness attendance over nearly two decades. The court found it futile to continue proceedings without the necessary stakeholders and prioritized timely judicial resolution over indefinite pending litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
02-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
24-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
27-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
07-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
17-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jun-2005
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2024
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jotana discharged all six accused persons and disposed of the animal cruelty case (FIR II/105/2005) due to the prosecution's persistent inability to serve summons on the accused or secure witness attendance over nearly two decades. The court found it futile to continue proceedings without the necessary stakeholders and prioritized timely judicial resolution over indefinite pending litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts