GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SAIYAD SAMSERMIYA HASANMIYA(Abated) Advocate - B D PANDYA — 4/2024
Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Section 11(1),a. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH160000072024
Filing Number
4/2024
Filing Date
06-May-2005
Registration No
4/2024
Registration Date
06-May-2005
Court
TALUKA COURT-JOTANA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
II 26
Police Station
KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. B B CHAVDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAIYAD SAMSERMIYA HASANMIYA(Abated) Advocate - B D PANDYA
-
2.SAIYAD AMIRMIYA SATTARMIYA
-
3.MAHMADARIF JAHURBHAI SEKH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Jotana Court acquitted Accused 2 (Saiyad Amirmiya Sattarmiya) and Accused 3 (Mahmadarif Jahurbhai Sekh) due to insufficient evidence linking them to alleged animal cruelty and illegal cattle slaughter charges under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Gujarat Animal Preservation Act. The prosecution failed to produce key witnesses despite multiple opportunities, creating fatal gaps in establishing their involvement, while the case against Accused 1 stood abated following his death during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
02-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
28-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
21-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge
-
22-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2005
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2024
Summary The Jotana Court acquitted Accused 2 (Saiyad Amirmiya Sattarmiya) and Accused 3 (Mahmadarif Jahurbhai Sekh) due to insufficient evidence linking them to alleged animal cruelty and illegal cattle slaughter charges under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Gujarat Animal Preservation Act. The prosecution failed to produce key witnesses despite multiple opportunities, creating fatal gaps in establishing their involvement, while the case against Accused 1 stood abated following his death during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts