GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SAIYAD SAMSERMIYA HASANMIYA(Abated) Advocate - B D PANDYA — 4/2024
Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Section 11(1),a. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH160000072024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4/2024
Filing Date
06-05-2005
Registration No
4/2024
Registration Date
06-05-2005
Court
TALUKA COURT-JOTANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
II 26
Police Station
KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. B B CHAVDA
Respondent(s)
SAIYAD SAMSERMIYA HASANMIYA(Abated) Advocate - B D PANDYA
SAIYAD AMIRMIYA SATTARMIYA
MAHMADARIF JAHURBHAI SEKH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 21-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 07-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Jotana Court acquitted Accused 2 (Saiyad Amirmiya Sattarmiya) and Accused 3 (Mahmadarif Jahurbhai Sekh) due to insufficient evidence linking them to alleged animal cruelty and illegal cattle slaughter charges under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Gujarat Animal Preservation Act. The prosecution failed to produce key witnesses despite multiple opportunities, creating fatal gaps in establishing their involvement, while the case against Accused 1 stood abated following his death during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Jotana Court acquitted Accused 2 (Saiyad Amirmiya Sattarmiya) and Accused 3 (Mahmadarif Jahurbhai Sekh) due to insufficient evidence linking them to alleged animal cruelty and illegal cattle slaughter charges under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Gujarat Animal Preservation Act. The prosecution failed to produce key witnesses despite multiple opportunities, creating fatal gaps in establishing their involvement, while the case against Accused 1 stood abated following his death during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts