RAVAL KANTIBHAI JESANGBHAI vs PATEL MENABEN VIRABHAI HEIR OF DECEASED PATEL VIRABHAI SHANKARBHAI Advocate - V R RANGWALA — 20/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 30,. Status: SALE OF MOVEABLE PROPERTY. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.

MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: GJMH150017712022

SALE OF MOVEABLE PROPERTY

Next Hearing

18th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

20/2022

Filing Date

23-12-2022

Registration No

20/2022

Registration Date

23-12-2022

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 30,

Petitioner(s)

RAVAL KANTIBHAI JESANGBHAI

Adv. R.R.MISTRI

Respondent(s)

PATEL MENABEN VIRABHAI HEIR OF DECEASED PATEL VIRABHAI SHANKARBHAI Advocate - V R RANGWALA

PATEL SOMABHAI VIRABHAI HEIR OF DECEASED PATEL VIRABHAI SHANKARBHAI

PATEL BHAGWANBHAI VIRABHAI HEIR OF DECEASED PATEL VIRABHAI SHANKARBHAI

PATEL CHANDUBHAI VIRABHAI HEIR OF DECEASED PATEL VIRABHAI SHANKARBHAI

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

04-05-2026

SALE OF MOVEABLE PROPERTY

27-04-2026

SALE OF MOVEABLE PROPERTY

20-04-2026

SALE OF MOVEABLE PROPERTY

06-04-2026

SALE OF MOVEABLE PROPERTY

30-03-2026

SALE OF MOVEABLE PROPERTY

Interim Orders

10-03-2025
ORDER

Case Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the execution petition against National Insurance Co. Ltd. (Opponent No. 5), holding that the insurance company was already exonerated from liability in the original judgment (MACP No. 225/2012) and the applicant failed to challenge that order or the subsequent dismissal of the review petition. Since the insurance company bears no liability under the prior judgment, it cannot be joined in the execution proceedings. No order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the execution petition against National Insurance Co. Ltd. (Opponent No. 5), holding that the insurance company was already exonerated from liability in the original judgment (MACP No. 225/2012) and the applicant failed to challenge that order or the subsequent dismissal of the review petition. Since the insurance company bears no liability under the prior judgment, it cannot be joined in the execution proceedings. No order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case