CHAUDHARI AMRITBHAI @ AMRATBHAI GANDABHAI vs PATEL RONAK NARENDRAKUMAR Advocate - B B DARAJI — 206/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMH150013852024

Filing Number

206/2024

Filing Date

21-Sep-2024

Registration No

206/2024

Registration Date

21-Sep-2024

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

5-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAUDHARI AMRITBHAI @ AMRATBHAI GANDABHAI

    Adv. M B PATHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL RONAK NARENDRAKUMAR Advocate - B B DARAJI

  2. 2.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. J B RAJPUT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court quashed the criminal conviction and one-year sentence imposed against the appellant under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, after finding that settlement had been reached between the parties and the cheque amount of ₹4,50,000 had been recovered. The court held that when parties settle a criminal case and the complainant receives full compensation, the conviction should be set aside, applying principles established by the Supreme Court regarding the purpose of Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  10. 31-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  11. 11-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  13. 14-Nov-2025

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  14. 14-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  15. 12-Sep-2025

    For R&P

    3rd Addl District Judge

  16. 11-Aug-2025

    For R&P

    3rd Addl District Judge

  17. 04-Jul-2025

    For R&P

    3rd Addl District Judge

  18. 29-May-2025

    For R&P

    3rd Addl District Judge

  19. 03-May-2025

    For R&P

    4th Addl District Judge

  20. 25-Mar-2025

    For R&P

    4th Addl District Judge

  21. 14-Feb-2025

    For R&P

    4th Addl District Judge

  22. 06-Jan-2025

    For R&P

    4th Addl District Judge

  23. 28-Nov-2024

    For R&P

    4th Addl District Judge

  24. 19-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 21-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 206/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court quashed the criminal conviction and one-year sentence imposed against the appellant under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, after finding that settlement had been reached between the parties and the cheque amount of ₹4,50,000 had been recovered. The court held that when parties settle a criminal case and the complainant receives full compensation, the conviction should be set aside, applying principles established by the Supreme Court regarding the purpose of Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case