CHAUDHARI AMRITBHAI @ AMRATBHAI GANDABHAI vs PATEL RONAK NARENDRAKUMAR Advocate - B B DARAJI — 206/2024
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJMH150013852024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
206/2024
Filing Date
21-09-2024
Registration No
206/2024
Registration Date
21-09-2024
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAUDHARI AMRITBHAI @ AMRATBHAI GANDABHAI
Adv. M B PATHAN
Respondent(s)
PATEL RONAK NARENDRAKUMAR Advocate - B B DARAJI
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. J B RAJPUT
Hearing History
Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 04-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court quashed the criminal conviction and one-year sentence imposed against the appellant under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, after finding that settlement had been reached between the parties and the cheque amount of ₹4,50,000 had been recovered. The court held that when parties settle a criminal case and the complainant receives full compensation, the conviction should be set aside, applying principles established by the Supreme Court regarding the purpose of Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court quashed the criminal conviction and one-year sentence imposed against the appellant under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, after finding that settlement had been reached between the parties and the cheque amount of ₹4,50,000 had been recovered. The court held that when parties settle a criminal case and the complainant receives full compensation, the conviction should be set aside, applying principles established by the Supreme Court regarding the purpose of Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts