CHAUDHARI AMRITBHAI @ AMRATBHAI GANDABHAI vs PATEL RONAK NARENDRAKUMAR Advocate - B B DARAJI — 206/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMH150013852024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

206/2024

Filing Date

21-09-2024

Registration No

206/2024

Registration Date

21-09-2024

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415,

Petitioner(s)

CHAUDHARI AMRITBHAI @ AMRATBHAI GANDABHAI

Adv. M B PATHAN

Respondent(s)

PATEL RONAK NARENDRAKUMAR Advocate - B B DARAJI

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. J B RAJPUT

Hearing History

Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

10-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

09-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

04-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court quashed the criminal conviction and one-year sentence imposed against the appellant under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, after finding that settlement had been reached between the parties and the cheque amount of ₹4,50,000 had been recovered. The court held that when parties settle a criminal case and the complainant receives full compensation, the conviction should be set aside, applying principles established by the Supreme Court regarding the purpose of Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court quashed the criminal conviction and one-year sentence imposed against the appellant under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, after finding that settlement had been reached between the parties and the cheque amount of ₹4,50,000 had been recovered. The court held that when parties settle a criminal case and the complainant receives full compensation, the conviction should be set aside, applying principles established by the Supreme Court regarding the purpose of Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case