BHIKHUMIYA RAJUMIYA AOD MUSALAMAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R B DARJI — 198/2024
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJMH150013202024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
198/2024
Filing Date
02-09-2024
Registration No
198/2024
Registration Date
02-09-2024
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
139
Police Station
UNJHA POLICE STATION - MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
1995
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHIKHUMIYA RAJUMIYA AOD MUSALAMAN
Adv. M S MEMAN
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R B DARJI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 03-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court allowed the appeal and acquitted appellant/accused no. 1 (Bhikhimiya Rajumiya) of charges under IPC sections 326, 323, and 504 due to insufficient and unreliable evidence presented by the prosecution. The court found critical deficiencies in the case: the complainant failed to identify the accused properly, eyewitnesses were not examined, medical evidence was not presented, and the five witnesses' testimony lacked proper corroboration, warranting the accused's acquittal and providing him the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the appeal and acquitted appellant/accused no. 1 (Bhikhimiya Rajumiya) of charges under IPC sections 326, 323, and 504 due to insufficient and unreliable evidence presented by the prosecution. The court found critical deficiencies in the case: the complainant failed to identify the accused properly, eyewitnesses were not examined, medical evidence was not presented, and the five witnesses' testimony lacked proper corroboration, warranting the accused's acquittal and providing him the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts