THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PARBATJI @ PINTU S/O RANJITJIRUPSANGJI THAKOR Advocate - R F THAKOR — 34/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,397,411,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJMH150011832022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
34/2022
Filing Date
22-08-2022
Registration No
34/2022
Registration Date
22-08-2022
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. J B RAJPUT
Respondent(s)
PARBATJI @ PINTU S/O RANJITJIRUPSANGJI THAKOR Advocate - R F THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 23-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court in Mehsana acquitted all five accused persons in these three consolidated criminal cases (Sessions Cases 32/2022, 33/2022, and 34/2022) involving charges under IPC Sections 392, 394, 396, 411, 114, and GP Act Section 135 (robbery-related offenses). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed robbery of goats from the complainant, as the evidence from witnesses, complainant, and panch officers did not corroborate the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court in Mehsana acquitted all five accused persons in these three consolidated criminal cases (Sessions Cases 32/2022, 33/2022, and 34/2022) involving charges under IPC Sections 392, 394, 396, 411, 114, and GP Act Section 135 (robbery-related offenses). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed robbery of goats from the complainant, as the evidence from witnesses, complainant, and panch officers did not corroborate the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts