THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LALAJI S/O JAGAJI SADAJI THAKOR Advocate - R F THAKOR — 33/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,397,411,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJMH150011812022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
33/2022
Filing Date
22-08-2022
Registration No
33/2022
Registration Date
22-08-2022
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. J B RAJPUT
Respondent(s)
LALAJI S/O JAGAJI SADAJI THAKOR Advocate - R F THAKOR
VIPULJI S/O SHIVAJI NANJI THAKOR
KAMLESHJI S/O GAMAJI DHULAJI THAKOR
THAKOR DASHRATHJI DEVUJI LAKHUJI
Hearing History
Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 23-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all five defendants of charges under IPC Sections 392, 394, 396, 411, 114 and GPS Act Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of goat theft and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment noted that witness testimonies were inconsistent, no stolen property was recovered from the accused, and identification parades were not properly conducted, resulting in insufficient evidence to convict despite police investigation claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all five defendants of charges under IPC Sections 392, 394, 396, 411, 114 and GPS Act Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of goat theft and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment noted that witness testimonies were inconsistent, no stolen property was recovered from the accused, and identification parades were not properly conducted, resulting in insufficient evidence to convict despite police investigation claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts