THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PARBATJI @ PINTU S/O RANJITJI RUPSANGJI THAKOR Advocate - R F THAKOR — 32/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,411,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJMH150011802022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
32/2022
Filing Date
22-08-2022
Registration No
32/2022
Registration Date
22-08-2022
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. J B RAJPUT
Respondent(s)
PARBATJI @ PINTU S/O RANJITJI RUPSANGJI THAKOR Advocate - R F THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 23-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all five defendants in three consolidated criminal cases (Sessions Cases 32/2022, 33/2022, and 34/2022) related to allegations of dacoity, criminal intimidation, and illegal weapons possession. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused robbed the complainant's goat using threats and a knife, as the complainant's own testimony and witness accounts lacked credibility and corroboration. The court ruled the accused not guilty under IPC Sections 392, 394, 396, 411, 114, and the GP Act Section 135. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all five defendants in three consolidated criminal cases (Sessions Cases 32/2022, 33/2022, and 34/2022) related to allegations of dacoity, criminal intimidation, and illegal weapons possession. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused robbed the complainant's goat using threats and a knife, as the complainant's own testimony and witness accounts lacked credibility and corroboration. The court ruled the accused not guilty under IPC Sections 392, 394, 396, 411, 114, and the GP Act Section 135. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts