PRAVINBHAI ISHWARBHAI SENMA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J B RAJPUT — 144/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA S

CNR: GJMH150003652026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

144/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

144/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206002260030

Police Station

VISNAGAR TALUKA POLICE STATION - MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

PRAVINBHAI ISHWARBHAI SENMA

Adv. S K CHAVDA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - J B RAJPUT

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

ORDER

10-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The Additional Sessions Court of Mehsana granted regular bail to the accused Pravinbhai Ishwarbhai Senma in Criminal Application No. 144/2026, charged under IPC Sections 108 and 54 (abetment to suicide) in connection with a death case. The court found that while the accused's name appeared in the investigation statement, he was not named in the FIR, and considered his stable local residence, lack of criminal history, and the fact that co-accused had been granted bail in related cases to justify bail on a bond of ₹25,000 with conditions including regular police reporting and court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court of Mehsana granted regular bail to the accused Pravinbhai Ishwarbhai Senma in Criminal Application No. 144/2026, charged under IPC Sections 108 and 54 (abetment to suicide) in connection with a death case. The court found that while the accused's name appeared in the investigation statement, he was not named in the FIR, and considered his stable local residence, lack of criminal history, and the fact that co-accused had been granted bail in related cases to justify bail on a bond of ₹25,000 with conditions including regular police reporting and court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case