PRAVINBHAI ISHWARBHAI SENMA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J B RAJPUT — 144/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S
CNR: GJMH150003652026
Filing Number
144/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
144/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
4-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206002260030
Police Station
VISNAGAR TALUKA POLICE STATION - MAHESANA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAVINBHAI ISHWARBHAI SENMA
Adv. S K CHAVDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - J B RAJPUT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The Additional Sessions Court of Mehsana granted regular bail to the accused Pravinbhai Ishwarbhai Senma in Criminal Application No. 144/2026, charged under IPC Sections 108 and 54 (abetment to suicide) in connection with a death case. The court found that while the accused's name appeared in the investigation statement, he was not named in the FIR, and considered his stable local residence, lack of criminal history, and the fact that co-accused had been granted bail in related cases to justify bail on a bond of ₹25,000 with conditions including regular police reporting and court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
Addl. District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 144/2026
The Additional Sessions Court of Mehsana granted regular bail to the accused Pravinbhai Ishwarbhai Senma in Criminal Application No. 144/2026, charged under IPC Sections 108 and 54 (abetment to suicide) in connection with a death case. The court found that while the accused's name appeared in the investigation statement, he was not named in the FIR, and considered his stable local residence, lack of criminal history, and the fact that co-accused had been granted bail in related cases to justify bail on a bond of ₹25,000 with conditions including regular police reporting and court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts