THAKOR ARJUNJI (AK) DIVANJI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - A S MAKWANA — 143/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA S

CNR: GJMH150003642026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

143/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

143/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206023250530

Police Station

KHERALU POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

THAKOR ARJUNJI (AK) DIVANJI

Adv. V B THAKOR

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - A S MAKWANA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

ORDER

10-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mehsana, granted regular bail to the accused, Thakor Arjunji, in a case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 54, and GP Act section 135 (relating to grievous hurt, criminal intimidation, and breach of a government order). The court found that the accused was a local resident with stable family ties and no criminal history, and that charging the accused after investigation did not justify continued detention, particularly since a co-accused received bail from the High Court under similar circumstances. The bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mehsana, granted regular bail to the accused, Thakor Arjunji, in a case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 54, and GP Act section 135 (relating to grievous hurt, criminal intimidation, and breach of a government order). The court found that the accused was a local resident with stable family ties and no criminal history, and that charging the accused after investigation did not justify continued detention, particularly since a co-accused received bail from the High Court under similar circumstances. The bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case