THAKOR ARJUNJI (AK) DIVANJI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - A S MAKWANA — 143/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S
CNR: GJMH150003642026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
143/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
143/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206023250530
Police Station
KHERALU POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THAKOR ARJUNJI (AK) DIVANJI
Adv. V B THAKOR
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - A S MAKWANA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
REPLY OF I.O.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 10-03-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mehsana, granted regular bail to the accused, Thakor Arjunji, in a case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 54, and GP Act section 135 (relating to grievous hurt, criminal intimidation, and breach of a government order). The court found that the accused was a local resident with stable family ties and no criminal history, and that charging the accused after investigation did not justify continued detention, particularly since a co-accused received bail from the High Court under similar circumstances. The bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Mehsana, granted regular bail to the accused, Thakor Arjunji, in a case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 54, and GP Act section 135 (relating to grievous hurt, criminal intimidation, and breach of a government order). The court found that the accused was a local resident with stable family ties and no criminal history, and that charging the accused after investigation did not justify continued detention, particularly since a co-accused received bail from the High Court under similar circumstances. The bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts