IBRAHIM (FARHAN)(ALU) S/O JUSHAB OSMAN KUMBHAR vs Government of Gujarat — 141/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S

CNR: GJMH150003622026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

141/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

141/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206033250719

Police Station

UNJHA POLICE STATION - MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

IBRAHIM (FARHAN)(ALU) S/O JUSHAB OSMAN KUMBHAR

Adv. S J PATHAN

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Additional Sessions Court at Visnagar (Mehsana district) rejected the regular bail application of Ibrahim alias Farhan alias Alu under CrPC Section 483. The court found that the accused was actively involved in a sophisticated cargo theft scheme where cumin (jeera) consignments worth approximately Rs. 95,87,715 were stolen from containers and partially sold for Rs. 4,09,750, constituting serious offenses under IPC Sections 316(2), 316(3), 317(2), 318(4), 334(2) and related provisions. The court denied bail citing the gravity of the crime, ongoing investigation, and risk of evidence tampering or further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court at Visnagar (Mehsana district) rejected the regular bail application of Ibrahim alias Farhan alias Alu under CrPC Section 483. The court found that the accused was actively involved in a sophisticated cargo theft scheme where cumin (jeera) consignments worth approximately Rs. 95,87,715 were stolen from containers and partially sold for Rs. 4,09,750, constituting serious offenses under IPC Sections 316(2), 316(3), 317(2), 318(4), 334(2) and related provisions. The court denied bail citing the gravity of the crime, ongoing investigation, and risk of evidence tampering or further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case