DHANAJI (DILIPJI) KANTIJI THAKOR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J B RAJPUT — 130/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S

CNR: GJMH150003212026

Filing Number

130/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

130/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHANAJI (DILIPJI) KANTIJI THAKOR

    Adv. P S THAKOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - J B RAJPUT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana rejected the bail application filed by accused Dhanaji (Dilip) Kantiji Thakore under Section 482 of the CrPC 2023 in a prohibition law case involving illegal possession of foreign liquor valued at Rs. 16,82,232. The court found that the accused had a criminal history, the investigation was ongoing, and granting bail would not serve justice, as the accused may abscond and there was risk of interference with the investigation process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 130/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana rejected the bail application filed by accused Dhanaji (Dilip) Kantiji Thakore under Section 482 of the CrPC 2023 in a prohibition law case involving illegal possession of foreign liquor valued at Rs. 16,82,232. The court found that the accused had a criminal history, the investigation was ongoing, and granting bail would not serve justice, as the accused may abscond and there was risk of interference with the investigation process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case