DHANAJI (DILIPJI) KANTIJI THAKOR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J B RAJPUT — 130/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.
CRMA S
CNR: GJMH150003212026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
130/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
130/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHANAJI (DILIPJI) KANTIJI THAKOR
Adv. P S THAKOR
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - J B RAJPUT
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana rejected the bail application filed by accused Dhanaji (Dilip) Kantiji Thakore under Section 482 of the CrPC 2023 in a prohibition law case involving illegal possession of foreign liquor valued at Rs. 16,82,232. The court found that the accused had a criminal history, the investigation was ongoing, and granting bail would not serve justice, as the accused may abscond and there was risk of interference with the investigation process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana rejected the bail application filed by accused Dhanaji (Dilip) Kantiji Thakore under Section 482 of the CrPC 2023 in a prohibition law case involving illegal possession of foreign liquor valued at Rs. 16,82,232. The court found that the accused had a criminal history, the investigation was ongoing, and granting bail would not serve justice, as the accused may abscond and there was risk of interference with the investigation process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts